This criterion measures the tangible and measurable outcomes of the nominee’s work.

• Individual Categories: How has the nominee’s contribution positively influenced their organisation, projects, colleagues, or the wider community? 
• Company Categories: What is the scale of the company’s impact on supporting young professionals, addressing the skills gap, or advancing the construction sector? 
• Evidence:

• Measurable outcomes such as increased employability, improved project outcomes, or enhanced diversity and inclusion.
• Regional economic impact, including job creation, skills development, and local supply chain growth.
• Contribution to regional levelling-up priorities and economic strategies.

Scoring Guide: 

• 1-9: Minor or limited impact with minimal evidence. 
• 10-18: Moderate impact with examples provided. 
• 19-30: Exceptional, far-reaching impact backed by strong evidence.
  

How well does the nomination align with the specific focus and objectives of the category?

• Does the nominee demonstrate excellence in the defined role or area of achievement? 
• Is there a clear connection between the nominee's contributions and the category's theme (e.g., innovation for engineers, leadership for site managers)?

Scoring Guide:

• 1-8: Limited relevance to the category’s goals.
• 9-16: Adequate relevance with some alignment. 
• 17-25: Strong alignment with outstanding demonstration of category-specific excellence.
  

This combines creative thinking, problem-solving, and sustainable practices. 

• Innovation: Has the nominee introduced or applied innovative approaches, tools, or ideas that address challenges or advance the industry? 
• Sustainability: How has the nominee contributed to environmental sustainability, social value, or equitable practices in their work?

Examples: 

• Use of AI or technology to improve processes, innovative solutions for sustainable construction. 
• Development of local supply chains and circular economy initiatives.
• Integration with regional skills strategies and training programs. 
• Community-focused sustainable practices that support local development goals.

Scoring Guide: 

• 1-6: Limited examples of innovation or sustainability. 
• 7-13: Demonstrated some innovation or sustainable practices.
• 14-20: Clear examples of forward-thinking and impactful sustainability initiatives.

Does the nominee provide clear, credible evidence to support their claims?

• Testimonials, case studies, data, or project examples that validate the nominee’s achievements. 
• For companies, evidence may include metrics, client feedback, or diversity and inclusion reports.

Scoring Guide: 

• 1-5: Insufficient or weak evidence.
• 6-10: Adequate evidence that partially supports claims. 
• 11-15: Robust, compelling evidence that strongly validates achievements.
  

How has the nominee contributed to inspiring, mentoring, or supporting young talent in the construction industry?

• Evidence of actions taken to address the skills gap, create opportunities, or empower the next generation of professionals.

Scoring Guide: 

• 1-3: Limited or indirect contribution to young talent. 
• 4-6: Clear examples of mentoring or supporting young professionals. 
• 7-10: Exceptional contribution demonstrated through:

• Measurable reduction in regional skills gaps.
• Strong local employment outcomes
• Effective partnerships with regional training providers and educational institutions.
• Clear alignment with regional economic growth strategies.